Movie review: “Mongol”
Marie Lascu,
Special to Grand Central Magazine

The film wants the viewer to marvel at Khan's strength as a survivor, or at the wonderful, unbreakable bond between him and his wife, writes Marie Lascu, but none of these things are executed with any personality.
Photograph by Courtesy photo
(Click here for more images.)
An “epic” film about Genghis
Kahn should not bore a person to tears.
Mongol
is shockingly uninteresting. Helmed by Russian Director and co-writer
Sergei Bodrov, and starring the excellent Japanese actor Tadanobu Asano,
Mongol seeks to chronicle Khan’s unexplored rise to power as emperor
of the largest contiguous empire in history.
There is very little concrete
historical information on record regarding the rise of Khan, and modern
Mongols are pretty peeved at some of the historical inaccuracies.
But there is nothing new about
filmmakers taking liberties with historical figures.
What Mongols should be mad
about is the fact that a film about their most famous historical figure
leaves no lasting impression.
The story is simple. It begins
with Khan (real name: Temudjin) at nine years old, on a journey to choose
a bride. His father intends for him to marry a woman from the tribe
he stole his mother from in an effort to bring peace between them. (Seriously?)
Instead, Temudjin follows his
heart. But as the years pass, he yearns for his bride. Of course,
it won't be easy to get her back. Old enemies emerge, and fighting
ensues. Temudjin must ally himself with a fellow Mongol to rescue his
bride.
After a short battle, the alliance
crumbles.
Outnumbered, Temudgjin and
his warriors are either slaughtered or sold into slavery, and Temudgjin
is imprisoned for a number of years.
And then without warning, the
film cuts to a number of years later. Temudjin has united all the Mongols
and brought law to a lawless land.
Basically, they skipped over
his actual rise to power.
The film wants the viewer to
marvel at his strength as a survivor, or at the wonderful, unbreakable
bond between him and his wife. But none of these things are executed
with any personality.
However, the film did have
a lot going for it, production-wise. The on-location shooting
in Mongolia made for exquisite landscapes. The set design is detailed
and realistic, as are the costumes.
But this great attention to
detail is wasted. The dialogue is lifeless; it’s as if they watched
a bunch of Hollywood epics and jotted down every line they had in common
and pasted them into a script. I was constantly thinking of Braveheart
throughout the film, and would venture to guess that Bodrov watched
that film more than a few times.
Unlike Mel Gibson, who also
took great liberties with his historical hero, Bodrov forgot to inject
real energy into the story. The events depicted are either mundane
or incredibly cliché. And the most significant events that would qualify
as a “rise to power” are skipped over in order to focus on drawn-out
events from Temudgjin's childhood.
Certainly the death of one’s
father and subsequent alienation are relevant, but these things don’t
give him actual power as a Khan. He gains power when he decides it’s
time to unite all of Mongolia.
Show me how he does that,
because it is from that point onward that he wipes out an entire civilization
and proceeds to amass the largest land empire in recorded history. These
small facts are given to us in a little paragraph at the end of the
film.
Considering the lack of factual
information, the filmmakers wasted an opportunity to be really creative
in telling the story of one of the world’s greatest conquerors. The
film was made far away from Hollywood, but has Tinseltown conventionalities
smeared all over it. Bill and Ted’s Excellent Adventure has
a more compelling version of Genghis Kahn than Mongol does.
What makes it even more disappointing
is the fact that they cast an excellent actor in the role of Khan; what
could've been a brilliant biopic is reduced to a less-than-average depiction
of the life of one of the world's greatest conquerors.
OVERALL GRADE: C-