Destinations:

Popular Stories:

Umphrey's McGee: The acension continues

Clark Birchmeier

The acension continues for Chicago’s Umphrey’s McGee, not only in terms of their commercial success but in creative accomplishment and instrumental achievement as well. The band formed in the late 90s in the South Bend area. The band consists of Kris Myers, Joel Cummins, Jake Cinninger, Brendan Bayliss, Andy Farag and Ryan Stasik. We spoke with Jake, Andy, and Ryan.


An interview with Metro Station's Anthony Improgo

Mike Fuksman

What do “Hannah Montana” and electro-indie-pop have in common? Virtually nothing, save for the formation of MySpace sensation Metro Station. The band formed as the result of an introduction between siblings of “Hannah Montana” stars Miley Cyrus and Mitchel Musso, but don't you dare call them a prefabricated band. Mike Fuksman chatted with drummer Anthony Improgo about playing amusement parks, touring with a young band and the L.A. music scene.


Fashionable swimsuit styles for all body types

Karlie Powell

Summer is in full swing, along with swimsuit season. For some of us femmes out there this leaves us with not a care in the world. But for the rest of us the mere thought of being in a bathing suit is our worst nightmare made into reality. Relax. Karlie Powell is here to solve all your bathing suit woes as she examines how to extenuate and flatter your body type with bathing suit cuts that are suited for all different body shapes and sizes.


Myth Busters visit CMU

Neil Blake, Jason Whitmore, Jeff Blevins, and Lindsay Holt

Grant Imahara and Kari Byron of the Discovery Channel's MythBusters spoke to a sold out crowd in Plachta Auditorium on Saturday, Jan. 26. Afterward, Lindsay Holt sat down with them for an exclusive interview where she found out what Grant and Kari did before they were on the show, and what advice they would give someone interested in more than a typical 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. job.


Incentives Bring Filmmakers to Michigan

Clark Birchmeier

Western Michigan Film & Video Alliance is an ever-growing on-line community, considering Michigan's natural beauty is a filmmaker's dream. Representative of WMFVA, Chuck Peterson, explains how tax incentives could have a lasting impact on the filmmaking industry and hopefully, the economy of Michigan.





Visit CMU

Valid CSS!
[Valid RSS]

Home > Arts and Entertainment > Movie review: “Mongol”

Movie review: “Mongol”

Marie Lascu,
Special to Grand Central Magazine

The film wants the viewer to marvel at Khan's strength as a survivor, or at the wonderful, unbreakable bond between him and his wife, writes Marie Lascu, but none of these things are executed with any personality. Photograph by Courtesy photo
(Click here for more images.)

An “epic” film about Genghis Kahn should not bore a person to tears.

Mongol is shockingly uninteresting. Helmed by Russian Director and co-writer Sergei Bodrov, and starring the excellent Japanese actor Tadanobu Asano, Mongol seeks to chronicle Khan’s unexplored rise to power as emperor of the largest contiguous empire in history.

There is very little concrete historical information on record regarding the rise of Khan, and modern Mongols are pretty peeved at some of the historical inaccuracies.

But there is nothing new about filmmakers taking liberties with historical figures.

What Mongols should be mad about is the fact that a film about their most famous historical figure leaves no lasting impression.

The story is simple. It begins with Khan (real name: Temudjin) at nine years old, on a journey to choose a bride. His father intends for him to marry a woman from the tribe he stole his mother from in an effort to bring peace between them. (Seriously?)

Instead, Temudjin follows his heart. But as the years pass, he yearns for his bride. Of course, it won't be easy to get her back. Old enemies emerge, and fighting ensues. Temudjin must ally himself with a fellow Mongol to rescue his bride.

After a short battle, the alliance crumbles.

Outnumbered, Temudgjin and his warriors are either slaughtered or sold into slavery, and Temudgjin is imprisoned for a number of years.

And then without warning, the film cuts to a number of years later. Temudjin has united all the Mongols and brought law to a lawless land.

Basically, they skipped over his actual rise to power.

The film wants the viewer to marvel at his strength as a survivor, or at the wonderful, unbreakable bond between him and his wife. But none of these things are executed with any personality.

However, the film did have a lot going for it, production-wise. The on-location shooting in Mongolia made for exquisite landscapes. The set design is detailed and realistic, as are the costumes.

But this great attention to detail is wasted. The dialogue is lifeless; it’s as if they watched a bunch of Hollywood epics and jotted down every line they had in common and pasted them into a script. I was constantly thinking of Braveheart throughout the film, and would venture to guess that Bodrov watched that film more than a few times.

Unlike Mel Gibson, who also took great liberties with his historical hero, Bodrov forgot to inject real energy into the story. The events depicted are either mundane or incredibly cliché. And the most significant events that would qualify as a “rise to power” are skipped over in order to focus on drawn-out events from Temudgjin's childhood.

Certainly the death of one’s father and subsequent alienation are relevant, but these things don’t give him actual power as a Khan. He gains power when he decides it’s time to unite all of Mongolia.

Show me how he does that, because it is from that point onward that he wipes out an entire civilization and proceeds to amass the largest land empire in recorded history. These small facts are given to us in a little paragraph at the end of the film.

Considering the lack of factual information, the filmmakers wasted an opportunity to be really creative in telling the story of one of the world’s greatest conquerors. The film was made far away from Hollywood, but has Tinseltown conventionalities smeared all over it. Bill and Ted’s Excellent Adventure has a more compelling version of Genghis Kahn than Mongol does.

What makes it even more disappointing is the fact that they cast an excellent actor in the role of Khan; what could've been a brilliant biopic is reduced to a less-than-average depiction of the life of one of the world's greatest conquerors.

OVERALL GRADE: C-

 

Comments

Interested in commenting? Sweet. Don't worry, we'll never sell, give away, or probably even look at your e-mail address. We just need it in case you forget your password.
E-mail:
Password:
Retype:
First:
Last:
Cancel [x]
E-mail:
Password:

Images

Click on thumbnails to view full size images and comments in the gallery.